Global Warming?

Serious discussion area.
You realize that sometimes you're not okay, you level off, you level off, you level off...
User avatar
I AM ME
Posts: 5956
Joined: 3/13/2002, 9:09 am
Location: Manitoba

Post by I AM ME »

meh, i'm going to go with the theory that is based on gases causing a blanket effect on our planet........seeing as how we allready knoew certain gases have already used this effect to make our atmosphere
"How can we justify spending so much on destruction and so little on life?" Matthew Good

"The white dove is gone, the one world has come down hard, so why not share the pain of our problems, when all around are wrong ways, when all around is hurt, i'll roll up in an odd shape and wait, untill the tide has turned.....with anger, i'm dead weight, i'm anchored"- IME, God Rocket (Into the Heart of Las Vegas) ^ Some say this song is about a terrorists thoughts before 911

"Pray for the sheep" Matt Good
"But it's alright, take the world and make it yours again" Matt Good

I felt it in the wind, and i saw it in the sky, i thought it was the end, i thought it was the 4th of July.

"Hold on, hold on children, your mother and father are leaving, hold on, hold on children your best freind's parents are leaving, leaving,.......*AHHH*! " - Death From Above - Black History Month
User avatar
Venom
Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2003, 3:27 pm
Location: Reality....you should all try it sometime
Contact:

Post by Venom »

meh, i'm going to go with the theory that is based on gases causing a blanket effect on our planet........seeing as how we allready knoew certain gases have already used this effect to make our atmosphere


You have quite the ego to think your're smarter than a group of 17,000 scientists with doctorate's. Seeing as you're still in high school and all.
User avatar
Eelco
Posts: 600
Joined: 3/16/2002, 3:43 am
Location: Tilburg, Holland
Contact:

Post by Eelco »

There's also a large of group of scientists who back up that theory, he didn't make it up himself. It's impossible for us to know which one is more true, if scientists can't even figure it out. His and my guess is that the theory that says that emissions are causing global warming is more accurate, you think the other theory is right. That has nothing to do with ego, just personal opinions.
User avatar
nelison
Posts: 5660
Joined: 3/16/2002, 9:37 pm

Post by nelison »

Well first off it says that 7,677 of the scientists are from related fields. The rest has some "training" at some point or another. I'm willing to bet they took a geology course or a biology course at some point in their post-secondary education, and that constitutes training.

Upon review of those who were one of the nearly 10,000 "scientists" who had "training" I decided to look up a few of them just to see what it was they do...


Roger L. Aamodt - from the National Cancer Institute.
M. Robert Aaron - Electrical Engineer (not to mention he's 80 years old)
Ralph F. Abate - Engineer
Ursula K Abbott - Poultry Scientist
Philip H Abelson - discovered Neptunium, and helped in the Manhattan Project, (90 years old)
John Abrams - Cell Biologist.

Not only this but of the first 20 people on the list, only 8 have PhDs. For most of those 20 I was unable to find any information about them, or any literature written by them. Of those first 20 only 3 or 4 actually could have passed as semi-qualified because they were either chemists or biologists in an unspecified field.
I added the ages of the two men because I felt it was relevent to them signing the petition. I doubt global warming is of interest to a man who helped in the creation of the Atomic Bomb. I doubt he could explain what global warming is. The other man helped in the construction of trans-Atlantic communications. How that relates to Global Warming I really don't know.
I can't wait until the day schools are over-funded and the military is forced to hold bake sales to buy planes.

"It's a great thing when you realize you still have the ability to surprise yourself. Makes you wonder what else you can do that you've forgotten about"
User avatar
starvingeyes
Posts: 2009
Joined: 5/8/2002, 3:44 pm
Location: california's not very far

Post by starvingeyes »

the theory of global warming remains an untested hypothesis. as a graduate of jr. high school science 9, i can assure you that untested hypothesis' are <i>not</i> scientific facts. i can further assure you that without some sort of experiment being conducted, all beliefs held by any scientist one way or the other on global warming is mere speculation and as such, not reasonable grounds for any leglislative action.

it is very easy to create a correlation between two things. for example, 5/6 of the last times i have had sex on a day, no troops were killed in iraq. i therefore, present to you a theory with as much scientific worth as global warming. as such, i expect you to recommend a law which dictates that i get as much sex as possible to reduce troop casualties in iraq.

or, perhaps we all take a second to remember that there is a lot of money to be made by ecological scare mongering as well as by oil and gasoline companies. i do not trust any information on global warming unless it is supported by some sort of scientifcally verifiable information.

suggested reading: <i>the skeptical environmentalist</i> by Bjorn Lomberg.
also
greenpiece.org
and
activistcash.com
Image
Post Reply