Page 2 of 2
Posted: 6/18/2003, 3:30 pm
by mosaik
you're right corey, it is in fact an oxymoron. excellent point. i intend to drop the phrase from my vocabulary.
even without the nobel prize, Friedman is a genius and a brilliant economist.
Posted: 6/18/2003, 3:41 pm
by Bandalero
then state it, don't hype you man up with shoddy prizes and awards. they mean nothing.
Posted: 6/18/2003, 3:44 pm
by mosaik
consider it stated.
Posted: 6/18/2003, 3:58 pm
by Bandalero
recognised as a stated phrase.
Posted: 6/19/2003, 8:46 am
by mosaik
Ok, rather then make a new thread, i'm just going to bump this one:
Where are the weapons of mass destruction that iraq supposedly had? how come the army can't find them?
Anybody know?
Posted: 6/19/2003, 8:52 am
by Axtech
Didn't they find a couple of ancient skulls while searching? These skulls had sharp objects near them that may have been crude weapons. Perhaps these are the WMD...?
Thank you, Jay Leno.
Posted: 6/19/2003, 9:01 am
by mosaik
Posted: 6/19/2003, 9:26 am
by happening fish
i heard they were thinking of giving Bush a nobel peace prize.. maybe it was a joke
At least I sure hope so
Posted: 6/19/2003, 12:07 pm
by starvingeyes
people.
saddam did not have weapons. what he had was a system in place made of seemingly benign things (shoes, dictionaries) etc. from which he could INSTANTLY generate them.
jeez.
Posted: 6/19/2003, 4:36 pm
by Bandalero
mosaik wrote:Ok, rather then make a new thread, i'm just going to bump this one:
Where are the weapons of mass destruction that iraq supposedly had? how come the army can't find them?
Anybody know?
their out in the open, as soon as you enter bagdad, take a right and then another quick left and you'll see the sign....
