http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/5minbud.htm
Buddhanet.net has tonnes of info.

actually 4 and 5 are Buddhist beliefs aswell, HUGE parts of the buddhist lifestyle, in fact to not Covet is basically central.Joe Cooler wrote:I wasn't implying anything. I have no idea how you could ever pick up such a notion from what I said. Secondly, there are many things that seperate the Buddhist religion from the Abrahamic faiths. If we comparing the ten commandments to the 5 basic buddhist precepts, we find quite a few.I AM ME wrote:Joe Cooler wrote: Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faiths. Of course they are going to have similar morals. Of the four, Buddhism values many things that the Abrahamic faiths do not.
Obviously you don't know much about Buddhism, i was reffering to comparisons between the 10 commandments, and the golden rule, to the Buddhist Precepts, which are almost identical. This is also true of Native religions and most every other religion you can find on earth. Are you implying that it is on fact true that Christianity, or its relative religions are infact the origin of morality? There was morailty in the world much before these religions existed, and in many areas uneffected by them. What about children raised athesist, do they not have morals?
1. You shall have no other God's before me.
2.You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below
3.You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God
4.Honor your father and your mother
5. Do not Covet.
If you consider the ten commandments the basis for Christianity and Judaism, the first two laws alone seperate Christianity and Judaism from a multitude of religons.
Yes the ten commandments have similar laws to Buddhism but you simply cannot pick and choose laws that are similar and then go on to assume they all have the same foundation.
actually homosexuality was an accepted part of North American, Med., Middle Eastern, Asian, and African culture before the arrival Abrahamic faiths. And many continued outside these areas. The reasoning is that if we are all made by the devine being, then homosexuality is also part of our design, or in nature religions, if nature is holy, and sexuality is a part of our nature then that itself is also holy and not to be denied or tampered with.closeyoureyes wrote:Not really. 100 years ago Homosexuality was a "Sin" or viewed as wrong almost everywhere, regardless of Religion. Hell, even into the 80's, and even now, people who have been raised without religion can still be unaccepting of it. Don't make it Religions fault. It isn't.Infact homosexual sin is basically an abnormalty among only the Christian faith and it's 2 relatives
You'd be right if you werent taking into account a major element of Christian and Jewish theology. When Adam and Eve sinned, God's perfect world then became imperfect. Nature once was perfect, but sin has marred it.I AM ME wrote:actually homosexuality was an accepted part of North American, Med., Middle Eastern, Asian, and African culture before the arrival Abrahamic faiths. And many continued outside these areas. The reasoning is that if we are all made by the devine being, then homosexuality is also part of our design, or in nature religions, if nature is holy, and sexuality is a part of our nature then that itself is also holy and not to be denied or tampered with.closeyoureyes wrote:Not really. 100 years ago Homosexuality was a "Sin" or viewed as wrong almost everywhere, regardless of Religion. Hell, even into the 80's, and even now, people who have been raised without religion can still be unaccepting of it. Don't make it Religions fault. It isn't.Infact homosexual sin is basically an abnormalty among only the Christian faith and it's 2 relatives
Am I "her"? Because I'm pretty sure I get it...And thats how i believe most people should act. And sorry i wasn't trying to attack Islam, i was just trying to use an example of religion in politics other then Christians to let her see it in a way that she doesn't feel as strongly about, and to see it with less bias, or at least opposite bias.
Well it certainly isn't a deficiency, but deficiency isn't the opposite of normal. If someone is extremely intelligent, they aren't normal, but they wouldn't be considered deficient.thirdhour wrote: I understand where you're coming from, but I still think being gay is normal, because it's not a defiency or abnormality.
There are way too many people in the world as it is. This is the last thing we as a society should be worried about. Maybe if there were more couples that were unable to have children, some of those children who have no parents would find some. Sure, creating a child from two parents that then raise that child is a beautiful thing, but there are many many situations were it doesn't work out like that, so whatever. I don't think it's a big deal.Cass wrote:I'd like to know how you could evolve to have children with same sex couples. This is impossible unless we can change our whole makeup to reproduce asexually.
Fair enough, you could put it under a, b, or d. (b being a result).thirdhour wrote:I'd put it under catergory d.don't ask why wrote:I'd put that under category b.
you also ignored the fact that as i stated before, homosexuality WAS excepted across the world before and outside abrhamic religion, you assumption that it has always been considered taboo, and unnatural acorss the world is false. Homosexuality as a Sin, is a abnormalty among organized religions.Joe Cooler wrote:You'd be right if you werent taking into account a major element of Christian and Jewish theology. When Adam and Eve sinned, God's perfect world then became imperfect. Nature once was perfect, but sin has marred it.I AM ME wrote:actually homosexuality was an accepted part of North American, Med., Middle Eastern, Asian, and African culture before the arrival Abrahamic faiths. And many continued outside these areas. The reasoning is that if we are all made by the devine being, then homosexuality is also part of our design, or in nature religions, if nature is holy, and sexuality is a part of our nature then that itself is also holy and not to be denied or tampered with.closeyoureyes wrote: Not really. 100 years ago Homosexuality was a "Sin" or viewed as wrong almost everywhere, regardless of Religion. Hell, even into the 80's, and even now, people who have been raised without religion can still be unaccepting of it. Don't make it Religions fault. It isn't.