What's worse?

Bandalero · Post by **Bandalero** » 7/30/2004, 11:34 pm

sandsleeper wrote: holy shit. that was a very well thought out, eloquent, and convincing argument.

thanks. sometimes for no reason i like to open up and vent this out. seriously right now it's flowing out of me.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 7/30/2004, 11:35 pm

dream in japanese · Post by **dream in japanese** » 7/30/2004, 11:37 pm

Henrietta · Post by **Henrietta** » 7/31/2004, 1:13 am

I didn't label me, you did. And seriously, I don't care if people get it on. I *ahem* have alot of friends who "break the law" as I see it. For some reason they think it's fine to vent to me. And look for support, I didn't realize you were asking for support. Maybe you should be a little bit more blunt to this prude. Besides, I didn't say YOU were the man whore Reno. Why did you just come out and say it!?

Cole · Post by **Cole** » 7/31/2004, 1:54 am

Bandalero wrote:look at who made this thread, and who labeled the man whore a man whore. it was the prude. the prude has once again decieved you. the propaganda is not only in her words but on the ballot! the prude does look down upon you when you give in, although today she will not recognise her faults. blinded by her beliefs and by her fervor, the prude will only see her cause and not what crimes against humanity she has committed. the prude isn't just any virgin, the prude is the virgin who judges, who makes sweeping generalizations about a certain people who may be different then her. this isn't a war against virgins, this is a war against virgins who have their bias and who see us who have engaged in sexual activity as lesser people. what qualifies a man to be a man whore? is it one sexual expirience? two? 20? only the prude will decide who is or "isn't" a man whore. do you want the prude clans to label you as they see fit? are you laundry that needs to be labeled and segregated by wool blend and polyester?

no children, you are but humans that make mistakes and need redemption. when the "man whore" looks for comfort from the prude, the prude attacks her so called enemy, and continues to call him judas because he has betrayed her belief structure.

for the love of all the world and everything good about it, let the prude know that you will not tolerate labels and condescending sermons from those that are blind themselves. the blind are only fit to lead the blind. open your eyes child. awake to a world without labels and persecution. join the "man whore" in his quest to rid the world of labels.

i fail to see how prudes 'sin'. waiting to have sex is not a sin, actually, according to the bible, aren't you supposed to wait until you are married to have sex? and wouldn't that mean that not waiting would be a sin?

i also fail to see how you could use the argument that prudes are liars and are deceitful. again, isn't it really the man whores who do that? how many girls would go for a guy who told her the truth about who he has slept with, if he truely is a 'man whore'? if he told every woman the truth, he most likely wouldn't have enough girls to be considered a 'man whore'. lying about having sex is in my definition of being deceitful, and girls who are honest about who they've slept with just don't strike me as deceitful.
i know you said this is a war against 'prude' virgins, and not virgins, but right back at you, who are you to decide who's 'prude' and who isn't?

stardom · Post by **stardom** » 7/31/2004, 6:13 am

a prude virgin

Joey · Post by **Joey** » 7/31/2004, 7:15 am

Cole wrote:aren't you supposed to wait until you are married to have sex? and wouldn't that mean that not waiting would be a sin?

IF that's your religion and those are your beliefs .... sex is a PERSONAL decision, a choice you have to decide for yourself .. not something you can let be dictated to you or talked into etc etc. If you want to have sex, then have sex ... if you don't, then don't ... but I hate when people say it's not allowed because 'thats what the bibile says' .. the bible says a lot of things. It all comes down to what YOU feel comfortable with .. not what other people/things think about it.

.:x:Marissa:x:. · Post by **.:x:Marissa:x:.** » 7/31/2004, 9:53 am

I would have to say man whore, simply because I have known some in the past who have hurt me.

Penguin Josh · Post by **Penguin Josh** » 7/31/2004, 9:57 am

is there such a thing as a prude man whore?

Bandalero · Post by **Bandalero** » 7/31/2004, 12:10 pm

Cass wrote:I didn't label me, you did. And seriously, I don't care if people get it on. I *ahem* have alot of friends who "break the law" as I see it. For some reason they think it's fine to vent to me. And look for support, I didn't realize you were asking for support. Maybe you should be a little bit more blunt to this prude. Besides, I didn't say YOU were the man whore Reno. Why did you just come out and say it!?

oh cass you don't know how the game of politics is played, first the prude calls the 'man whore' a man whore, so in retaliation, the "man whore" must call the enemy something. the prude is the only thing that could come to mind. i have yet to name myself on this issue. read it again, where have i come out and said i have come to you for support. i have said that the 'man whore' has in the past come to you for redemption, but that's not me.

do you see children? once again the prude has labeled the unsuspecting. she had once again passed judgement based on her belief structure and is infringing on me by catagorising me as a man whore. revolt chindren....REVOLT!!!

Cole: i never said the prude clans have sinned. the bible is a belief structure forced upon people by the prudes. others might not believe in the bible or take its teaching as only a small part of their lives. let people do as they please. prudes lie because they do look down upon you when you give into temptation. they make generalizations and paint with a broad brush. that's what classifies a prude, the person that looks down on you for moral sins, the person that forces their will/belief structure upon you, and the person that makes generalizations about people when they have yet to try it.

Josh: how can a person of great sin and debactury make sweeping generalizations and look down upon the masses? he is only higher then the prude in social class. and like murderers and drugdealers/addicts and stuff like that. yeah, ok i might not have made a point here.

godamn this is fun. this isn't serious though, its just for shits and giggles.

Henrietta · Post by **Henrietta** » 7/31/2004, 1:11 pm

Well, the question is...what's worse? I mean, who does a prude hurt? A virgin one at that!

Bandalero · Post by **Bandalero** » 8/2/2004, 11:09 pm

prudes hurt because they instigate debates like this.

now then, what pray tell ever loving virgin, numerical value do you have to reach in order to be deemed a man whore?

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 8/3/2004, 12:27 pm

A man may be named as a man whore when he uses women for sex and then leaves them after, the number of women is insignifignant as long as the man actually cared for them all deeply. In which case he's just a guy that cared for many women but they all left breaking his heart forcing him off into the open legs of another women only to have his heart broken again until he comes under the judging gaze of the prude virgin, who labels him a man whore, he is no man whore just a lonley man looking for some lovin. But i still voted man whore lol

lemonphile4 · Post by **lemonphile4** » 8/3/2004, 1:11 pm

I'd say 50+ makes you a man whore.

Joey · Post by **Joey** » 8/3/2004, 3:55 pm

if you've sleep with 50 + people that's just nasty and disgusting on top of being a whore .. damn

5-10 + is pretty nasty in my book .. but that's just me.

taking a person's age into account as well ..

lemonphile4 · Post by **lemonphile4** » 8/3/2004, 5:40 pm

One of my best friends slept with ten guys the first week she was at school. She's not a whore- she just has really low self esteem.

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 8/3/2004, 5:44 pm

either that or she really likes gettin laid

joe_canadian · Post by **joe_canadian** » 8/3/2004, 6:06 pm

Axtech wrote:haha, take that Josh!

manwhore |---------------------me------| prude

I was wondering how long it would take you to say that.

joe_canadian · Post by **joe_canadian** » 8/3/2004, 6:07 pm

Cole wrote:
Bandalero wrote:look at who made this thread, and who labeled the man whore a man whore. it was the prude. the prude has once again decieved you. the propaganda is not only in her words but on the ballot! the prude does look down upon you when you give in, although today she will not recognise her faults. blinded by her beliefs and by her fervor, the prude will only see her cause and not what crimes against humanity she has committed. the prude isn't just any virgin, the prude is the virgin who judges, who makes sweeping generalizations about a certain people who may be different then her. this isn't a war against virgins, this is a war against virgins who have their bias and who see us who have engaged in sexual activity as lesser people. what qualifies a man to be a man whore? is it one sexual expirience? two? 20? only the prude will decide who is or "isn't" a man whore. do you want the prude clans to label you as they see fit? are you laundry that needs to be labeled and segregated by wool blend and polyester?

no children, you are but humans that make mistakes and need redemption. when the "man whore" looks for comfort from the prude, the prude attacks her so called enemy, and continues to call him judas because he has betrayed her belief structure.

for the love of all the world and everything good about it, let the prude know that you will not tolerate labels and condescending sermons from those that are blind themselves. the blind are only fit to lead the blind. open your eyes child. awake to a world without labels and persecution. join the "man whore" in his quest to rid the world of labels.
i fail to see how prudes 'sin'. waiting to have sex is not a sin, actually, according to the bible, aren't you supposed to wait until you are married to have sex? and wouldn't that mean that not waiting would be a sin?

i also fail to see how you could use the argument that prudes are liars and are deceitful. again, isn't it really the man whores who do that? how many girls would go for a guy who told her the truth about who he has slept with, if he truely is a 'man whore'? if he told every woman the truth, he most likely wouldn't have enough girls to be considered a 'man whore'. lying about having sex is in my definition of being deceitful, and girls who are honest about who they've slept with just don't strike me as deceitful.
i know you said this is a war against 'prude' virgins, and not virgins, but right back at you, who are you to decide who's 'prude' and who isn't?

He's joking around, relax.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 8/3/2004, 6:41 pm

ClumsyMonkey.net

ClumsyMonkey.net

What's worse?

What's worse?