State of the Union Address

Joey · Post by **Joey** » 1/29/2003, 4:30 pm

hehe .. just got this in an e-mail and I had to share :lol:

Frodo failed!

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/29/2003, 4:56 pm

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 1/29/2003, 5:51 pm

can someone elaborate on what Raine said about Chretien?

starvingeyes · Post by **starvingeyes** » 1/30/2003, 9:36 am

he said

"it's been such a fucked up day, with the state of the union and bush saying they're still going to invade iraq.

but it looks like we've finally got a prime minister with some balls, who said canada won't join a war with america if they do invade. but we don't know what he really thinks...

and he's kind of a fucking asshole anyways"

he got a MASSIVE pop after he said that. :mrgreen:

boo yah.

bush sucks, war sucks, chretien sucks, gore sucks.

that's my doctor seuss styled poetry for the day. enjoy.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/30/2003, 12:08 pm

xchrisx wrote:bush sucks, war sucks, chretien sucks, gore sucks.

Amen.

Although, I think I'll stick with One Fish, Two Fish.

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 1/30/2003, 12:33 pm

i dont think anybody could do a pleasing job running a country with all the crap going on now though.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/30/2003, 12:34 pm

I could.

Bomb the Swiss, damnit.

lora · Post by **lora** » 1/30/2003, 12:35 pm

the swiss is never safe with rob around.

starseed_10 · Post by **starseed_10** » 1/30/2003, 12:36 pm

those bastards.

happening fish · Post by **happening fish** » 1/30/2003, 8:59 pm

i counted at least 8 "nukular"s in that speech. he was this><close to getting smarties chucked at him.

superboots · Post by **superboots** » 1/30/2003, 9:03 pm

we were doing that too!!!!!!

emily · Post by **emily** » 1/31/2003, 2:53 pm

my science teacher used to always say "nucular." stuff like that bugs me.

committed · Post by **committed** » 1/31/2003, 2:59 pm

ash has a cd entitled nu-clear sounds

Venom · Post by **Venom** » 1/31/2003, 7:22 pm

Going to war with Iraq is the right thing to do! I'm getting sick of people that keep preaching that "Bush is a cowboy", "Bush is a warmonger", etc. What are we supposed to do sit back and wait for Saddam to sell chemical and biological weapons to terrorists so that they can use them on the population of the US, Canada, UK, etc? Come on people the evidence that he has these weapons is irrefutable. He has used them on his own people for Christ's sake. And for the record Canada is siding with the US. For all of the people that feel we should just sit back and wait to be attacked first I hope you all feel the effects personnally and then maybe you will rethink this "Iraq was is bad" retoric.

committed · Post by **committed** » 1/31/2003, 7:43 pm

saddam is in the u.s.'s back pocket. the war is about oil, not terrorism.

Axtech · Post by **Axtech** » 1/31/2003, 7:51 pm

Everyone has weapons of mass destruction which could destroy the earth five times over. No one uses them because if they do, everyone else will. Bush is trying to take over the world to bring "peace". That's not what peace is. How can he expect to nullify everyone else's weapons, yet keep America's for "defence"? Everyone else is also looking to defend themselves. Bush is making people see everyone else as evil tyrants trying to hurt everyone. However, from their eyes, Bush is the evil tyrant trying to hurt them. They're both right. The world is corrupt. There is nothing we can do about. I'm just sitting back and waiting for the end.

cor3y · Post by **cor3y** » 1/31/2003, 7:55 pm

Hmm, I wouldn't say theyre in our back pocket. I'll take the middle road and say it's about both. There's no way you can say that Saddam doesn't cause any trouble, he clearly does. Therefore, there is other reasons than economics for going to war, even though they may not be the whole reason. And I dont even know why debates go on in the first place. All I read about in all my general studies classes are about people bitching. It's ridiculous. Everyone either wants it their way, or no one's way. "Fuck what other people think, I'm right and everyone is wrong." It's so annoying. No one will ever be completely happy. It's the same way with the issue of going to war. If we weren't planning on doing it, people would complain that we should be. They will also be complaining in another 6 months when gas is rationed and $3.00 a gallon.

Another thought about the SOTU address... are the applause breaks needed?? It was so stupid watching people give standing ovations after every sentence, sit back down, and do it again. It's a speech, and they made it seem like a sporting event. The fact that there is commentating doesn't make it seem any less "for entertainment purposes only." They should just let him talk.

luckyJQ9 · Post by **luckyJQ9** » 1/31/2003, 9:22 pm

cor3y wrote:
Another thought about the SOTU address... are the applause breaks needed?? It was so stupid watching people give standing ovations after every sentence, sit back down, and do it again. It's a speech, and they made it seem like a sporting event. The fact that there is commentating doesn't make it seem any less "for entertainment purposes only." They should just let him talk.

It's some sort of traditional thingie. If you notice it was mostly Republicans who participated in the standing ovation stuff. It's some sort of propaganda scheme.

2+2=5 · Post by **2+2=5** » 1/31/2003, 10:39 pm

Fuck war.
Fuck Bush.
The world is too fucked up for any good decisions to be made. I'm waiting for the nukes and the end of the world. I think it will happen soon.

cor3y · Post by **cor3y** » 1/31/2003, 11:15 pm

Yea Jacqui, I know, just seems so stupid and informal.

...and this thread has turned into the most depressing thing I ever read haha. Unfortunately it's probably the truth.

ClumsyMonkey.net

ClumsyMonkey.net

State of the Union Address