Page 1 of 3
Son Of Mask
Posted: 2/21/2005, 8:30 pm
by jeremy_a
Anyone seen it? I hear it's untolerable shit and possibly one of the worst movies ever made. And by the looks of the preview, it's probably true. But is it honestly that bad? I mean, they did remove the original movie from shelves before this movie came out, apparently because they didn't want people to compare the two.
Posted: 2/21/2005, 8:31 pm
by megxyz128
oh man i hate that band.
Posted: 2/21/2005, 8:33 pm
by jeremy_a
Yeah, I just realized that it was in the wrong forum. My bad.
Posted: 2/21/2005, 8:40 pm
by Rusty
Isn't it "son of the mask"?
Posted: 2/21/2005, 9:49 pm
by reza
i think i may want to watch it. i liked the first. does jim carrey have anything to do witht his one?
Posted: 2/21/2005, 10:06 pm
by joe_canadian
No he doesn't.
Posted: 2/21/2005, 10:19 pm
by reza
Awww that sucks. You know Cameron Diaz was only something like 16 years-old in the original?
Posted: 2/21/2005, 10:25 pm
by joe_canadian
No, she was 21.
Posted: 2/21/2005, 11:04 pm
by closeyoureyes
BOOM
Posted: 2/22/2005, 12:38 am
by starseed_10
i'd rather chew tinfoil than watch this movie.
Posted: 2/22/2005, 2:40 am
by beautiful liar
do you have something against chewing tin foil!???!???!??!
Posted: 2/22/2005, 10:33 am
by Random Name
Why are we even acknowledging the existance of this movie?
Posted: 2/22/2005, 11:13 am
by nikki4982
Hah, the second I saw the thread title, I was gonna post "WHY does this movie get a thread on the CM?!?"
Why do they feel the need to destroy good movies by making god awful sequels?
Re: Son Of Mask
Posted: 2/22/2005, 1:24 pm
by Lando
jeremy_a wrote:Anyone seen it? I hear it's untolerable shit and possibly one of the worst movies ever made. And by the looks of the preview, it's probably true.
I haven't seen it, but I refuse to actually see this movie. I can't even say how pissed off I am that they made this fuckin' joke of a movie. Carrey signed on for the sequel many years ago, but due to studio/schedule/funding problems he backed out after a delay of 5 years.
Posted: 2/22/2005, 1:41 pm
by AnnieDreams
Yeah, from the second I saw the first preview, I was thinking that this was going to really really suck.
Posted: 2/22/2005, 1:42 pm
by Lando
It's sad that movies like this can get millions of dollars worth of funding while movie ideas that are really great only get independant releases.
Posted: 2/22/2005, 5:01 pm
by Candy-coated Fake
Just the preview of this movie makes me want to vomit in my mouth.
Oops, too late.
Posted: 2/22/2005, 7:52 pm
by jeremy_a
They made a classic into a G rated piece of shit.
Re: Son Of Mask
Posted: 2/22/2005, 8:10 pm
by Gimme_Shelter
Lando wrote:jeremy_a wrote:Anyone seen it? I hear it's untolerable shit and possibly one of the worst movies ever made. And by the looks of the preview, it's probably true.
I haven't seen it, but I refuse to actually see this movie. I can't even say how pissed off I am that they made this fuckin' joke of a movie. Carrey signed on for the sequel many years ago, but due to studio/schedule/funding problems he backed out after a delay of 5 years.
he gave up after only 5 years, geez what a quit'er
he should have just wasted his time and waited 5 more years for them to bring this piece of shit to him so he could say
"are you all fuckin retards, i could sell my bottled piss on ebay and make more money then this movie"
then he could kick their asses fuckin Johnny Squares style
Posted: 2/23/2005, 3:06 am
by Lando
He would too and this film would deserve a Jim Carrey ass kicking.