ClumsyMonkey.net

I haven't seen any video but from the transcripts and news articles i've read it sounds like this trial is going to be some good television.

everytime he says "i didn't do it" the whole iraq situation just gets worse for america.

i actually find myself cheering for him... he's very well spoken and intelligent. a much more charismatic and likeable speaker then good ole GW.

it's going to be interesting.

He also called the Kuwaitis "dogs" and said they deserved what they got. Supporting Saddam? Doesn't sound very anarchist to me....

I think he means that in a American govt. vs Saddam case he favours Saddam. Personally I think I'm the same, as Bush should be tried for war crimes and if Saddam has to be put to trial than so should Bush.

puh lease

did i say "wow this guy has sure made me reconsider my position on government?"

Jim you're right btw

bush should be tried for war crimes, but you know he won't, and isn't saddam still claiming to be the president of iraq? and whatever happened to bush's hunt for osama?

Please proof-read posts. When keep leaving out words it confusing.



See?


Bush should be tried for war crimes, but he won't be. Of course Sadam is still claiming to be the president of Iraq. If the US was taken over by Etheopia, Bush would still claim to be the president ... no matter how many Etheopian children are in office.

sorry about the last post i fixed it tho and so true interesting how this will play out though

i doubt it. there's absolutely no way he won't be put to death.

true, its so inhuman to put someone to death in my opinion

J-Neli wrote:I think he means that in a American govt. vs Saddam case he favours Saddam. Personally I think I'm the same, as Bush should be tried for war crimes and if Saddam has to be put to trial than so should Bush.

good point. that would be an interesting trial...

news flash. America isn't trying Saddam.... *gasp* the Iraqis are!

america has too much influence on iraq to be counted out of the trial.

they'll intercede as much as they have to.

Does it really matter anymore? Honestly, does it?

Bush did what he said he wanted to do, liberate those Iraqis, not to mention that we're not trying Saddam, so why bother discussing?

What this is just going to turn into is a "Bush is evil" thread (which I agree with,) so why not just go to the Farenheit 9/11 thread and have fun there?

Corey wrote:news flash. America isn't trying Saddam.... *gasp* the Iraqis are!

So umm when are the American people putting Bush and co. on trial?

J-Neli wrote:

Corey wrote:news flash. America isn't trying Saddam.... *gasp* the Iraqis are!

So umm when are the American people putting Bush and co. on trial?

As soon as you find proof that he killed his own people.

Corey wrote:

J-Neli wrote:

Corey wrote:news flash. America isn't trying Saddam.... *gasp* the Iraqis are!

So umm when are the American people putting Bush and co. on trial?

As soon as you find proof that he killed his own people.

or proof that he started an illegal war

Well he's killed hundreds of his own men by putting them in a war based upon a lie. I don't know about you but no matter how you put it, a death is a death.

what about the canadians he killed? you all remember that friendly fire don't you? it took him waaaay to long to apoligize for that...did he even apoligize i forget now?

J-Neli wrote:Well he's killed hundreds of his own men by putting them in a war based upon a lie. I don't know about you but no matter how you put it, a death is a death.

So that's the same thing as ordering the release of sarin gas on a specific religious group living in your country that doesn't even know its coming?