ClumsyMonkey.net

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/taheri200311181102.asp

So do you still think they don't support the terrorists?

*I would like to note that this investigation and article was written by an Arab Muslim.

Interesting read mate

so first of all because some protestors are bad ALL of them are? Venom your a extreme conservitive........so does that mean your a sympathiser with the KKK? After all, we're all about generalizing these days. Or perhaps your a Facist??? Because all us protestors must be communist after all, would that mean that because your for the war and conservitive your a Facist?

godamn venom, not every protester is a fucking extremist. pull your head out of your ass a little. just a little.

man you need to learn to see the world in more then just black and white

godamn venom, not every protester is a fucking extremist. pull your head out of your ass a little. just a little.

When did I say they were ALL extremist?? All I did was post an article about the group that arranged these protests. They didn't even give the people the option of what they could put on their signs! These people were only allowed to chant certain things.

To quote you directly "the protesters are terrorist supporters." This implies all. Not "some protesters are terrorist supporters." All.

Besides that one quote, you've always held a "black and white" view, constantly saying things like "if you're not with us you're against us."

That's like saying "the priests are gay and have sex with chior boys". Yes, some are. But that's a small minority.

They were led by such people, they could only chant and hold certain signs, looks to me that they were the pawns of terrorist supporters. Hmmmmm are they just not smart enough to notice this?

Is anyone surprised by his "black and white" views? Venom is a staunch supporter of the man who is most comfortable on the moral ground of "good vs. evil", like some sort of fucked up real-life comic book.

for some reason I don't see a comparison between Venom and Captain Planet.

History speaks for itself. The US has been criticized for its policies before (Wilson's 14 points, Treaty of Versailles, Bosnia, Kosovo, etc) and they have time and time again proved people wrong. I see the forest for the trees. Some of you do not.

They were led by such people, they could only chant and hold certain signs, looks to me that they were the pawns of terrorist supporters. Hmmmmm are they just not smart enough to notice this?

Are they not smart enough to notice who is sponsoring them or do they agree with their cause?? Either way it doesn't speak well for them.

Venom wrote:
Are they not smart enough to notice who is sponsoring them or do they agree with their cause?? Either way it doesn't speak well for them.

Or maybe something in between. Once again: the world is not black and white.
They are against the war, so they protest. But they don't support everything the organisers say. Just like you don't support everything your presidents says, wait a minute, that's exactly what you do, never mind.

Then why not organize their own protest?? Why protest under the name of such an organization?? Makes no sense no matter how you spin it.

Because everybody has a different opinion, and if everyone organises his own demonstration, there would only be one person at the time and that doesn't quite make the impact as with thousands of people at the same time. They support the general idea behind the protest, stop the war / no war, that's why they join. They don't protest under the name of the organisation, they're not members of the organisation, they just want to let Bush and Blair know that not everybody believes their lies.

And so they allow themselves to be FORCED to only carry certain signs and only chant certain things. Interesting......does anyone else see where this is going? If they would have just demonstrated on their own everyone COULD have voiced their personal views FREELY!! Theres that word "free" again. Hmmmmmm. I hope that they were naive to the fact that the organizers were who they were.

lets just back this up. Your opinion is that protestors are terrorist supporters. NOT EVERY PROTESTOR ON EARTH WERE AT THAT ASSEMBLY. You could consider me a protestor against the war in iraq, does that mean i agree with violence, or terrorism? I doubt it. I happeneed to give $200 of my money, which is alot for a highschool kid, to charities in Iraq. I can say i've personally made a bigger difference in Iraqi's lives then some guy that sits at hom, waves a flag and say's "bomb 'em fuckers! Show them they can't attack us and get away with it!"

No that is not my point! Stop putting words in my mouth. I said THESE protesters were or at least made it look that way! Instead of twisting my words answer the questions I posed.