DOUBLE ALBUM?

Scutley · Post by **Scutley** » 5/21/2005, 9:01 pm

Dr. Hobo wrote:why isnt the album out yet?
for one.. they still have stuff theyre changing
raine wasnt pleased with something on the album and they went back and changed it
a few times i believe

well, then how come duncun had a "copy of the finished album in his hand"

Johnny · Post by **Johnny** » 5/21/2005, 10:49 pm

jeebus dude. Do you not know anything about the music industry? Bands can re-tool their music you know....even if they have a "finished album".

Hope · Post by **Hope** » 5/21/2005, 11:57 pm

yeah and just because they are done the music part doesnt mean they can release it right away... like jim said there's marketing and shit to be done

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 5/22/2005, 1:41 am

Oh yes, and also... Lando... Powdered Toast Man rules... you better not be making that up!!!!!

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 5/22/2005, 3:15 am

Quick man cling tenaciously to my buttocks!

nikki4982 · Post by **nikki4982** » 5/22/2005, 4:17 am

I gotta say... not nearly enough results come up when you type "powdered toast man" into Google Images.

Scutley · Post by **Scutley** » 5/22/2005, 1:26 pm

Chanandler Bong wrote:jeebus dude. Do you not know anything about the music industry? Bands can re-tool their music you know....even if they have a "finished album".

So couldn't they decide to "re-tool" their albun and possibly add another track or 2? They probably won't but couldn't they?

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 5/22/2005, 3:17 pm

Scutley · Post by **Scutley** » 5/22/2005, 3:24 pm

then I rest my case

Lando · Post by **Lando** » 5/22/2005, 3:26 pm

Suitcase?

Rusty · Post by **Rusty** » 5/22/2005, 4:29 pm

Scutley wrote:
Chanandler Bong wrote:jeebus dude. Do you not know anything about the music industry? Bands can re-tool their music you know....even if they have a "finished album".
So couldn't they decide to "re-tool" their albun and possibly add another track or 2? They probably won't but couldn't they?

It's possible they could add another track or two, but why would they? If they are just tweaking a few things on their finished album it doesn't make a lot of sense to add a whole new or song or to if it didn't make the cut the first time. Imagine you're writing an essay, you start with a rough copy first and work it through, then you print it off and check it over. After that you go back and fix up a few details here and there, change it around, perfect it, but rarley do you add a new paragraph or two that you kept originally for a reason.

Corey · Post by **Corey** » 5/25/2005, 4:54 am

Yes. But they could very possibly remove 1 or 2 tracks. 13 is no guarantee. My prediction: the usual 10-11 songs. I never said there would be 2 albums. I'm pretty sure that won't happen. I just said that we don't know FOR SURE how many tracks there will be.

On a side note, "finished" by definition means to bring to an end. If they are still making tweaks to the album then there could not possibly be a "finished" copy.

nelison · Post by **nelison** » 5/25/2005, 8:55 am

I think it;s far more likely they remove some songs than add some. What would be the point of adding 2 more songs from a business standpoint? They'll make the same amount of money off of 13 songs as they will with 15.

Dr. Hobo · Post by **Dr. Hobo** » 5/25/2005, 1:59 pm

Corey wrote:Yes. But they could very possibly remove 1 or 2 tracks. 13 is no guarantee. My prediction: the usual 10-11 songs. I never said there would be 2 albums. I'm pretty sure that won't happen. I just said that we don't know FOR SURE how many tracks there will be.

On a side note, "finished" by definition means to bring to an end. If they are still making tweaks to the album then there could not possibly be a "finished" copy.

from what duncan said... it was the finished album that was given to the guys but as of a few weeks earlier raine decided he didnt like the sound of one chorus and wanted to change it

ClumsyMonkey.net

ClumsyMonkey.net

DOUBLE ALBUM?