Page 3 of 3

Posted: 3/21/2003, 3:55 pm
by nelison
Having read and seen everything Moore has done I can honestly say that he's brilliant. Period. I only wish Stupid White Men came out after 9/11 and this "war on terrorism", That definately would have made for a very good and interesting read.

Posted: 3/21/2003, 3:56 pm
by nelison
Having read and seen everything Moore has done I can honestly say that he's brilliant. Period. I only wish Stupid White Men came out after 9/11 and this "war on terrorism", That definately would have made for a very good and interesting read.

Posted: 3/21/2003, 6:31 pm
by I AM ME
actually the pointing a gun at you and killing you socialism doug refers to is extreme socialism, my government is NDP, i got a speeding ticket last year and i was surprisingliy not shot in the head....

Posted: 3/21/2003, 6:35 pm
by I AM ME
the Shoot you and kill you Socialism doug speaks of is very very extreme socialism, moderate is all based on equality and community, i live in a NDP government and i've never been once shot even when i got a speeding ticket next year, i understand what your saying but your exagerating

Posted: 3/21/2003, 6:35 pm
by I AM ME
:freak:

Posted: 3/26/2003, 10:54 am
by mosaik
Well.

Brilliant, eh? I would call him something else. I would call him a fucking liar.

Posted: 3/26/2003, 1:14 pm
by Bandalero
so that was michael moore at the oscars? :roll:

to say that the majority disapprove this war, when later on that night the polls on the news said 70% were in favor. that tells me something.

Posted: 3/26/2003, 6:42 pm
by Dabekk
I have a question for all you people who reply with things like "you don't know what you're talking about so shut your mouth" when someone raises a point. If you guys are so smart, why don't you share the wealth? It's really pointless to discuss political matters if you're just going to tell someone that they're stupid if you disagree with them. You're not convincing anyone to agree with you by insulting them.

Posted: 3/26/2003, 10:28 pm
by thirdhour
he may of changed small details, and im not saying i agree with that, but in order to get a message across, you have to show things from your point of view. all media are fabrications, including documentrys. every time you watch one you have to remember it was edited to make it look the way the film maker wanted it to be. in order for a documentry to present the whole truth, they would just have to keep the camera running continually and not edit at all.

doug, did you agree with any of the messages in bowling for columbine?

Posted: 3/26/2003, 11:21 pm
by mosaik
yes.

all the ones about the people the us government killed.

but do i think that anybody, especially the state, has the right to take a mans means of self-defense from him?

no. and i never will.