i do not think they would pose much of a problem at all. empirical evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of first world citizens see the rationale in refraining from the iniation of force. there are very few people today that commit violent acts against other humans - at least outside of ...

building a jail cell around me is holding me against my will, which is tantamount to the initiation of force. therefore, if you were to build one around me, either myself or my associates would take the neccessary recourse against you. depending on how you respond, this could be anything from simply ...

no, i oppose the INIATIATION of the use of force - as in, "throwing the first punch".

i believe it is wrong to force any one person to do anything else, unless they have already iniated force. therefore, i believe it is wrong to murder, but not wrong to kill a murderer.

No, I disagree. There are plenty of people out there who would not live harmoniously with you. From hardened criminals to the hard headed. From the rabid of each side of the political spectrum. From those who bullied you at school to those who bully you now (in what ever form). It is impossible ...

not really that relevant, but it is widely speculated (with good reason) that the OK city bombing may have been staged by the us government as well.

one thing i can say for sure is that the "truck bomb" allegedy used by mcveigh wasn't nearly powerful enough to do that kind of damage to the building ...

yes. i exist harmonisously amongst other people today, don't i?

i oppose force, or rather, the iniation of the use of it.

i also reject the notion that some men are fit to rule over others.

so yes, i am an anarchist. i believe it the total dissolution of the state. think of it as 100% deregulation of everything.

Ummm... as in anarachy? Self rule doesn't work too well. In fact self rule cannot work while we still have individuality. Which is needed for self rule, which can't work with it. You haven't thought that one through too well.
**EDIT**

Unless you have a love to live in utter chaos without anyform ...

government of the mind, as in, self rule.

possibly. what are you trying to say here?

concrete does not burn. the only gravity driven explanation for the pulverisation of the concrete must be the falling mass of the impacted floors. but if this is true, what pushed the building down? the floor slabs were the only concrete used in the building, everything else was steel.

no. i reject the political process of democracy on the basis that it is irrational, illogical, unjust and unreasonable.

obviously the demolition set up used in this affair would have to have been reasonably complicated. it is not difficult however, with existing technology, to time the detonation sequence to start at or around the point of impact.

there are a number of problems with the pancake theory. firstly, the ...

Korzic wrote:People will also go through unbelieveable lengths to believe everything the government says is a lie too.

why? doing so is usually unneccessary, as is the case here.

i knew you weren't. i was just kind of commenting on how bizarre it is.

throwing people off is unneccessary.

as i'm sure you are now aware, the population will go through unbelievable lengths to believe everything the government says.

i don't know about how long they lasted and at least as far as i know, it was only the 3 demolished buildings that the drills were conducted in.

these drills were not fire drills, they were conducted multiple times over the span of a few weeks. this is consistent with the amount of time required to prep a building for demolition.

and i do not understand your second question.

you guys keep repeating how things "seem" to you and making assumptions based on what you think an operation of this nature would require to pull off. personnel requirements for this type of OP are not NEARLY as high as you'd think because military and intelligence personnel are USED to doing shady ...

didn't say you were stupid, i also used to believe there was no plane at the pentagon. google steven riskus' pictures, i can't find them at the moment. there are at least 3 in which you can see the HUGE hole across the face of the building. and somewhere, 911review.com has a mirrored article by some ...